Coming soon!
This is a fake book cover made with the Penguin Classics Cover Generator (https://penguin.jos.ht/), featuring a photograph by Christian Houge (https://cargocollective.com/christianhouge/Shadow-Within-2010-2013).
You have reached the blog of G. Wulfing, author of kidult fantasy and other bits of magic. Visit my Smashwords page (linked below) to view my e-books, help yourself to the free ones, and subscribe to this blog or follow me on Tumblr for announcements of new ones.
Coming soon!
This is a fake book cover made with the Penguin Classics Cover Generator (https://penguin.jos.ht/), featuring a photograph by Christian Houge (https://cargocollective.com/christianhouge/Shadow-Within-2010-2013).
This is a fake book cover (made with the Penguin Classics Cover Generator) for my short story ‘Malachi’s Family’. The Penguin Classics Cover Generator is fun, and very easy to use.
To Luna
24 March, 2008.
Writers, nowadays, have a host of resources and tools at our disposal. I admire the authors of the past who had nothing but pen and paper, or stylus and clay, and I firmly believe that masterpieces can be created in spite of practical limitations; however, in the age of endless distractions, anything that makes concentrating and organising one's thoughts easier is welcome. Below are brief descriptions of my favourite tools.
Scrivener.
I love this software. It’s designed by writers, for writers, and it has everything I could desire in a piece of fiction-writing software. I bought a Mac-compatible version for about fifty New Zealand dollars. I don’t use all the features (incidentally, I’m told that some writers use even fewer of Scrivener’s features than I do), but that’s not the point: what I do use is fantastic. It makes writing faster, easier, and more efficient than using multiple Word documents for each story, which was my previous technique. A bonus: it’s pleasant to use and actually makes me feel more professional and in control. According to the website, it’s great for non-fiction writers too.
Candles and rain sounds or other ambient noise.
For reasons explained here. The short version is that the rain soundtrack, or similar ambient noise, keeps my brain distracted enough from the silence that it can focus, but not so distracted that it abandons writing altogether. There are many websites that supply beautiful, atmospheric ambient noise, often with customisable settings.
Masala chai lattes; hot chocolate; hot chocolate with coffee.
In descending order of healthiness, those are my three favourite beverages to drink whilst writing. I’m not sure that my progress would be what it is if not for those three. I like most types of tea, but they just don’t have the fullness and body that I seem to require from a drink when working. I started making and drinking masala chai lattes with raw honey in an effort to break my beloved but too-sugary habit of two cups of hot chocolate — with or without added coffee — per day, and it worked. I have now replaced the sugary hot chocolate with a sugar-free chocolate mix, with coffee and full-fat milk, but I still keep my first love in reserve for when I need something extra hefty to get me through a painful edit or an all-nighter.
Smashwords.
Best. Publishing. Platform. Ever.
In all fairness, I’ve never tried any other. But I see no need to. In order to publish a book, I upload an appropriately-formatted Word document to Smashwords, plus a cover image, and thereafter Smashwords does all the work for me. My single document is transformed into multiple formats that work on a host of different e-reading devices, and are distributed to assorted online booksellers without any further effort on my part. A couple of days or weeks later, I can search the Internet for my newly-published book and see it sitting on virtual shelves.
My soulmate’s intellect.
My soulmate is the only person I allow to see my work before it is published. He was a published author many years before I was, and he is, to date, the only person I trust to give me feedback. I don’t run every story past him, but the vast majority of them are read by him before being published. I can ask him difficult questions and he will give me considered, respectful responses that make his point without offending my delicate, drama-queen ego too much. If everyone had a friend like him, the world would be a better place and we would all be better people.
Last year I wrote in this post about some of my pet peeves in fiction, and I wanted to make this post a counterpart and discuss some of my favourite things in fiction ... but all I could think of were more pet peeves. So here is a second round of annoyances, and perhaps one day I will be able to think of some more positive things.
Prophecy. The Chosen One is prophesied to do something or other, and often the exact nature of the prophecy barely matters: the point is that someone is Chosen by something — probably destiny, which I ranted about in the previous post of this nature. But who makes these prophecies? Where do the prophecies come from? How are they communicated? Does someone write them down in Ye Massive Notebooke Of Prophecies That We Fulley Expecte To Come Trewe? Why do people believe them? How many are there? What happens if prophecies clash, or seem mutually exclusive? What happens if a prophecy is proven wrong? Who determines whether a prophecy has been proven wrong or if it simply hasn't come true yet or if it was misinterpreted in the first place, and how? Prophecy as a trope typically seems to be used merely to spackle over holes in plots and premises, but if I think about it for five seconds it invariably raises more questions than it answers.
Vows broken for shock value or comedy. You've heard of Chekhov’s Gun; I now present to you:
I dislike this trend, for several reasons. It cheapens the vows, particularly when they are broken easily and without consequence. It feels like denying characters agency: the character states that they do not want to do a thing, so the author snickers and deliberately makes them do the thing. I am aware that fictional characters are fictional and therefore cannot be bullied, but for readers who have been bullied or teased for being or saying any of the abovementioned things, it is upsetting to see narratives inflicting on fictional people what real people have inflicted on them, the readers, in real life. It often seems like the author is deliberately inviting the reader to laugh at the character for having the audacity to make vows, or state firm preferences; as though we, the readers, are being expected to join in the mockery. Moreover, it is, of course, transparent and predictable: the moment a character declares that they don't care for children, I brace myself for the arrival of their interactions with children.
The Girl™. "Here is our cast of main characters! They all have personalities! We have an aloof, serious one, a sensitive, hotheaded one, a charming, roguish one, and a girl. That's it: that's her personality: she is a girl. What does she do? What does she want? Well, she's a girl, so she falls in love with one of the main characters, because that's what girls are for. Her motivation in the story is that she has a crush on one of the male characters, because girls never want anything besides romance. She doesn't need to participate in the plot or have any character development: she's a girl."
"They'll be okay. They're a fighter." This is invariably spoken, with intent to reassure, when the protagonist, or a supporting character, is ill, injured, or unconscious. It bothers me for multiple reasons. Firstly, we are all fighters. Everyone who has survived their life up to this point is a fighter. "He's a fighter" — and you're not? I'm not? His great-great-great-great-grandmother was not? Secondly, being a fighter or being tenacious is no guarantee that anyone will be okay. There are plenty of people who fight for their lives and lose. I have known people who seemed indestructible and endlessly vivacious, right up until they suddenly fell ill and died within a week. They fought to live, and fighting did not save them. Everyone is a fighter in some way, and being a fighter will not make you okay.
Unconvincing or unnecessary romance. I could write an entire thesis on why most romantic subplots in fiction are ghastly, but it would just be infuriating. Romantic love saves the day/world! (Despite the fact that, in context, it should not be able to!) This character is incomplete without romantic love! This character who met their love interest two days ago is now ready to marry them and will be miserable forever without this person they met two days ago! Romantic love is not magic; it is not the be-all and end-all of everything; people — real or fictional — who are without it and/or are not interested in it are not incomplete or lacking in any way; and it is not the same as attraction.
Unrealistic injuries. I once read a conventionally published fiction book in which a horse took three arrows to the belly. The horse not only survived but required zero medical attention and the arrow wounds were never mentioned again. The narrative gave them all the consideration of mosquito bites. In reality, a single arrow embedding itself in the belly of a horse could be fatal and would require immediate expert medical attention and probably surgery. Even a grazing wound or a nick should have been inspected and treated. If your character gets shot or stabbed or even badly bruised, there should be consequences. Any kind of breakage or sprain could require months of treatment and rehabilitation, and the body part may never be the same again; moreover, other parts of the body often suffer under the strain of compensating for, and preserving, the injured part: for example, if the left ankle is injured, the right knee and hip joints may be strained or even damaged from having to take the full weight of the body, and the spine — including the neck — may become misaligned due to the stress of limping. If you're going to injure your characters, either treat the injuries realistically or explain how they were magically healed two days later.
Super-rapid skill gain. It takes years to become good at longbow archery. It takes years to become good at weaving, swordfighting, herbal medicine, piloting, horseriding, speaking a language, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera; and even after a certain level of skill has been reached, mistakes will still occur. People who have been studying Spanish for three years will still have misunderstandings, forget words, and make grammatical slips. Natural talent is helpful, but it is not a substitute for practice, tutoring, or experience. If a character suddenly becomes a skilled archer, surgeon, or mathematician in the span of three days, I want a very convincing explanation as to how.
Human Loves Me
September 2020 to 29 April, 2021.